Fiction Analysis

How did Molly Weasley kill Bellatrix?

Strong Verdict

In the book, Molly kills Bellatrix with an unnamed curse that strikes her over the heart; the spell is not identified in canon.

Competing Theories

We've gathered the strongest arguments from across the internet. Here's how they stack up.

Canonical Unnamed Curse

Best Supported

Canonical reading in HP Lexicon, Wizarding World, and SFF Stack Exchange summaries

In the novel, Molly kills Bellatrix with an unspecified curse that strikes over the heart; the text intentionally withholds the spell’s identity.

  • The book explicitly shows a chest strike “directly over her heart,” immediate death, and never names or colors the spell.
  • Rowling consistently depicts Avada Kedavra with a green jet and usually names it; those cues are absent here, implying a different, unspecified curse.
  • Wizarding World commentary confirms Molly killed Bellatrix but pointedly does not identify a spell.

Background Context

During the Battle of Hogwarts, Molly Weasley duels Bellatrix Lestrange and kills her. Fans often ask what spell she used and whether it’s named in the books. Clarifying this resolves confusion between canon and popular assumptions.

Full Analysis

A detailed breakdown of each theory with supporting evidence.

Core Claim

In the novel, Molly kills Bellatrix with an unspecified curse that strikes over the heart; the text intentionally withholds the spell’s identity.

Deathly Hallows narrates Molly’s finishing blow with precise placement but no incantation or color: the curse “hit her squarely in the chest, directly over her heart,” Bellatrix’s smile freezes, and she falls dead. Rowling repeatedly names and color-cues Avada Kedavra; here she does neither, despite detailing other spells in the same chapter. The most economical reading is that the narrative deliberately leaves the exact spell unspecified while making clear it was lethal. This is reinforced by official and respected secondary summaries, which state Molly killed Bellatrix without naming a spell, and by Wizarding World’s materials that celebrate the moment without identifying the magic used. Given Rowling’s consistent pattern of flagging Avada Kedavra explicitly, the absence of its hallmark cues—word and green light—strongly implies an unnamed, non-AK lethal curse.

Core Claim

Molly used the Killing Curse, achieving the duel’s sudden, woundless lethality in a life-or-death defense of her child.

The scene is explicitly a fight to kill in the chaos of the Great Hall, and Molly’s protective fury makes recourse to an Unforgivable plausible. Bellatrix dies instantly after a chest hit with no described physical trauma, a hallmark outcome of Avada Kedavra. In prior instances, AK produces immediate, woundless death—exactly what the text conveys when Bellatrix’s smile freezes and she drops dead. That the text does not name or color the spell is not dispositive: nonverbal casting is common in Deathly Hallows, and the narration in the melee often elides incantations and visual details. Given the urgency, Molly could have cast a nonverbal AK; the simplest lethal explanation that fits the instantaneous outcome is the Killing Curse.

Core Claim

Molly’s winning blow was a powerful non-AK curse that fatally damaged Bellatrix when it struck directly over her heart.

Rowling highlights the strike’s exact placement—“squarely in the chest, directly over her heart”—and then records immediate death without naming or coloring the spell. This is consistent with a lethal non-AK effect: the series establishes that magic other than AK can cause catastrophic, even fatal harm, and DH’s narration often omits incantations in intense duels. The lack of AK’s trademark green cue strongly points away from the Killing Curse. Within that frame, several high-energy options fit: an overpowered Stunning or blasting curse, or a Dolohov-like internal-injury hex. Any such spell hitting the heart at close range could be instantly fatal without leaving externally described wounds, matching the on-page result while respecting the text’s decision not to specify a named incantation.

Core Claim

In the movie adaptation, Molly’s spell causes Bellatrix to crack and disintegrate, a cinematic effect not supported by the book.

Deathly Hallows Part 2 depicts Molly landing a blast that petrifies/hardens Bellatrix, who then fissures and shatters into ash-like fragments. No incantation is given, leaving the film to convey the kill through a distinctive visual grammar rather than a named spell. As with other duel VFX in the films, the priority is readability and spectacle in a crowded sequence. This portrayal diverges from the novel, which neither describes petrification nor disintegration and instead emphasizes a chest strike and sudden death. Accordingly, the shattering effect should be understood as a movie-specific interpretation to sell the moment to a visual audience, not as a canonical spell identification for the books.

The Verdict

Strong Verdict

Best Supported Theory

Canonical Unnamed Curse

How We Weighed the Evidence

I prioritized the primary canon (Deathly Hallows) because it directly narrates the duel. The text describes the final blow’s placement and immediate effect but withholds an incantation and any visual hallmark. That omission, against Rowling’s usual practice of flagging certain spells, is the most probative evidence. Secondary film visuals were treated as interpretive and subordinate to the novels. Tertiary commentary that celebrates the moment without naming a spell supports the conclusion that the identity is deliberately unspecified. Internal logic was used only to test consistency (e.g., how Avada Kedavra is typically presented) rather than to supply a missing name.

Our Conclusion

In the novel, Molly Weasley kills Bellatrix by landing an unnamed curse squarely over her heart; Bellatrix dies instantly. The text does not provide an incantation or the green-light cue associated with Avada Kedavra, indicating the spell’s identity is intentionally left unspecified. Therefore, the best-supported answer is that Molly’s finishing blow is a lethal but unnamed curse as depicted in Deathly Hallows. The film’s shattering effect is a cinematic interpretation and not authoritative for the books. While AK remains a conceivable inference, the narrative’s omission of AK’s hallmark cues makes the unnamed-curse reading stronger than any specific-spell identification.

What Would Change This?

This verdict could be upgraded to definitive if the creators explicitly confirmed this theory, or if new canonical material addressed the question directly.